heat pump for a 100 m² prefab house: consumption and operation at new-build standard

Short answer & context

This page deliberately answers a narrowly defined planning question. It connects the specific configuration with a checklist so quotations, authority guidance and technical decisions are not mixed together.

At 100 m², systems should be derived from the actual building and occupancy concept. Heat pump, PV, battery, ventilation and envelope interact; choosing one component from a brochure size alone can lead to over- or undersizing.

What deserves a 2026 check

KfW lists several new-build funding routes, including 124, 296, 297/298 and 300. Eligibility and combinations depend on the project. Germany’s Building Modernisation Act has also been in force since 29 July 2026, so heating decisions should not rely on older blanket statements.

Decision in 5 steps

1. Define the goal, site and scope in writing.
2. Mark missing documents and assumptions.
3. Calculate or quote at least two comparable variants.
4. Verify dynamic items such as rates, funding, tariffs or local law at the current date.
5. Document the decision, source and date.

Document this configuration clearly

The table is not a substitute for design documents. It works as a cover sheet for comparing quotations and decisions: when one parameter changes, record which costs, technical evidence, deadlines or permission questions change with it.

Current 2026 context

Energy and heating topics are particularly time-sensitive in 2026. KfW distinguishes several new-build programmes and efficiency measures, while the Building Modernisation Act has changed the policy/legal starting point for heating decisions since 29 July 2026. The guidance is therefore framed as a checking logic rather than a fixed statement that one technology is mandatory.

Document and quotation checklist

• Current drawing/design revision with date and version.
• Specification with clear included and excluded work.
• Quantities, quality level, products or technically equivalent requirements.
• Interfaces with plot, foundation, building services and external works.
• Price date, validity, payment schedule and variation rules.
• Open authority, funding, finance or insurance questions with owner and deadline.
• Differences between quotation, contract, selections and later change requests.

The more complex the project, the more useful an independent review by the appropriate professional becomes. Ideally that review happens before a binding signature, not only after a dispute has arisen.

Avoid common mistakes

A good comparison starts with identical scope, not the final price. What is missing often becomes the most expensive item later.

• Treating brochure price as total project cost.
• Assuming unclear work is included.
• Using outdated funding, legal or price information without checking.
• Approving changes without a revised plan and cost impact.